BP-MS data of retention time drift.JPG 579
Could MS-DIAL handle with the data of large retention time drift？ April 18, 2020, 04:43:02 AM
figure 1. mass list .JPG 510
Mass tolerance and final alignment result (version 4.16) March 23, 2020, 01:00:23 AM
figure 2. test parameters.JPG 498
Mass tolerance and final alignment result (version 4.16) March 23, 2020, 01:00:23 AM
MS-DIAL parameters.JPG 553
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results May 25, 2020, 08:26:22 PM
Parameter-1.JPG 521
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results June 03, 2020, 06:58:04 AM
Parameter-2.JPG 544
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results June 03, 2020, 06:58:04 AM
Parameter-3.JPG 553
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results June 03, 2020, 06:58:04 AM
Parameter-4.JPG 535
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results June 03, 2020, 06:58:04 AM
Parameter-5.JPG 498
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results June 03, 2020, 06:58:04 AM
Parameter-6.JPG 541
Re: Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results June 03, 2020, 06:58:04 AM
Pos-All public-id para.PNG 425
MS-DIAL (version 4.16) MSP database selection and mass tolerance September 16, 2020, 04:49:39 AM
Slide1.JPG 516
Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results May 25, 2020, 06:27:59 AM
Slide2.JPG 539
Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results May 25, 2020, 06:27:59 AM
Slide3.JPG 501
Why is not accuracy when MS-DIAL process from raw data to alignment results May 25, 2020, 06:27:59 AM
Waters-6 raw data-MS-dial parameters.JPG 501
Re: Mass tolerance and final alignment result (version 4.16) April 04, 2020, 12:38:01 AM
